Docket



View the website of the Court here; facsimile text from that page follows:


 Case Search
 Docket Number
 Involved Party
 Attorney Appearance
 Lower Court
 Lower Court Judge


SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT
for the Commonwealth
Case Docket

ROBERT O'BRIEN vs. ALAN BOROWSKI

SJC-10866

CASE HEADERCase StatusDecided (Full Opinion)Status Date01/31/2012NatureSuperintendence, c211, s3Entry Date12/08/2010AppellantDefendantCase TypeCivilBrief StatusBrief DueQuorumIreland, C.J., Spina, Cordy, Botsford, Gants, Duffly, Lenk, JJ.Argued Date11/07/2011Decision Date01/31/2012AC/SJ NumberSJ-2010-0442CitationDAR/FAR NumberLower Ct Number2010-45RO-149Lower CourtSJC for Suffolk CountyLower Ct JudgeMaureen E. Walsh, J.Route to SJCDirect Entry: Single Justice Reservation & Report

INVOLVED PARTYATTORNEY APPEARANCE

Robert O'Brien
Defendant/Appellant
Blue brief filed
Jeremia A. Pollard, Esquire


Alan Borowski
Plaintiff/Appellee
Red brief filed
Eric Lucentini, Esquire 
Sandra Lucentini, Esquire 
Elaine M. Reall, Esquire

The Victim Rights Law Center
Amicus
Amicus brief filed
Susan M. Finegan, Esquire 
Andrew Neil Nathanson, Esquire 
Elissa Flynn-Poppey, Esquire 
Helen Gerostathos Guyton, Esquire 
Jamison Arterton, Esquire

The Boston Area Rape Crisis Center
Amicus
Awaiting green brief
Susan M. Finegan, Esquire 
Andrew Neil Nathanson, Esquire 
Elissa Flynn-Poppey, Esquire 
Helen Gerostathos Guyton, Esquire 
Jamison Arterton, Esquire

Jane Doe, Inc.
Amicus
Awaiting green brief
Susan M. Finegan, Esquire 
Andrew Neil Nathanson, Esquire 
Elissa Flynn-Poppey, Esquire 
Helen Gerostathos Guyton, Esquire 
Jamison Arterton, Esquire

ACLU of Massachusetts
Amicus
Amicus brief filed
Patricia A. DeJuneas, Esquire 
Sarah R. Wunsch, Esquire

BRIEFSAppellant O Brien Brief Appellee Borowski Brief Amicus Victim Rights Brief Amicus ACLU Brief 

DOCKET ENTRIESEntry Date Paper  Entry Text12/08/2010#1Entered. Notice to counsel.12/17/2010#2Agreed upon briefing schedule: Appellant's brief and record appendix on or before 1/18/2011; and Appellee's brief to be filed 30 days following service. (Allowed) Notice sent.01/18/2011#3SERVICE of appellant's brief for Robert O'Brien by Jeremia A. Pollard, Esquire.02/04/2011#4ANNOUNCEMENT: The Justices are soliciting amicus briefs. Whether G. L. c. 258E, the civil harassment protection statute, is unconstitutionally broad to the extent that it may regulate protected speech; whether litigation under that statute becomes moot by reason of criminal proceedings based on the same conduct; whether G. L. c. 211, § 3, should continue as the avenue of review of orders entered under the statute. Argument is tentatively scheduled for May 2011. Amicus submissions are due two weeks before the first day of the sitting in which argument is scheduled.02/22/2011#5SERVICE of brief for Plaintiff/Appellee Alan Borowski by Elaine M. Reall, Eric Lucentini, Sandra Lucentini.05/31/2011#6NOTICE of September argument sent.07/11/2011#7NOTICE of October argument sent.09/02/2011#8NOTICE of November argument sent.09/30/2011#9ORDERED for Reserve Argument on November 7. Notice sent.10/04/2011#10Order of Reserve Argument vacated. ORDERED for argument on November 7. Notice sent.10/17/2011#11MOTION TO FILE AMICUS BRIEF, filed for The Victim Rights Law Center & others by Susan M. Finegan, Esquire.(Referred to the quorum.)10/17/2011#12SERVICE of amicus brief for Amicus The Victim Rights Law Center & others by Susan M. Finegan.11/03/2011#13MOTION TO FILE AMICUS BRIEF, filed for ACLU of Massachusetts by Patricia A. DeJuneas, Esquire.11/03/2011#14SERVICE of amicus brief for Amicus ACLU of Massachusetts by Patricia A. DeJuneas.11/07/2011 Oral argument held. (Ireland, C.J., Spina, J., Cordy, J., Botsford, J., Gants, J., Duffly, J., Lenk, J.).01/31/2012#15RESCRIPT (Full Opinion): We remand the case to the county court and direct the single justice to vacate the order of harassment. (By the Court) Reasons as on file. Notice sent.

< TopAs of 02/01/2012 03:03

(2012-02-02 19:00:44)

Nothing contained herein is tendered as nor should it be considered as legal advice.  What is legal is not necessarily justice.  Almost all of reality is non-"published", ergo, what is legally affirmed is always a retarded misrepresentation of reality.   Use at your own risk!