Civil Harassment .com

Stopping Abuse of Civil Harassment Restraining Order Law

Defense against false Civil Harassment allegations

Notice of Non-Severability: this page is part of a whole work from which it may not be severed. Any construction of the meaning of any element on this page requires consideration of all other pages published as the whole work named www.civilharassment.com. Entire content of Legal Notice page and all other pages of www.civilharassment.com is expressly incorporated as part of this page.

Lobby to Reform
Public Policy

We are interested in your story and your restraining order and would be grateful to receive a copy of it (you may delete any personal references on the form). are compiling data to demonstrate that the Legislature's intent is not being followed by the trial courts. Examples include deletions from the restraining order forms approved by the California Judicial Council, such as the striking by the judge or commissioner of the mandatory firearms prohibition and the personal conduct and stay away orders, or the addition of "other orders" that limit your constitutional rights of free speech and petition or your real property rights.

Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!

Cameras and tripods are not weapons! — you lying idiots! — in Memoriam, Reuter's cameraman Namir Noor-Eldeen mistaken for man with a gun

Unpublished Opinion Non-Citation Rules

California rules of court prevent citation to unpublished opinions. The rule is highly controversial as it contributes to non-uniform application of the law.

A. Kozinski and S. Reinhardt, “Please Don’t Cite This!” (June 2000) California Lawyer, 43; R. Arnold, Unpublished Opinions: A Comment (1999) 1 J. App. Prac. & Process 219 (1999); B. Martin, Jr., In Defense of Unpublished Opinions (1999) 60 Ohio St. L.J. 177; C. Carpenter, Jr., The No-Citation Rule for Unpublished Opinions: Do the Ends of Expediency for Overloaded Appellate Courts Justify the Means of Secrecy? (1998) 50 S.C. L. Rev. 235; K. Shuldberg, Digital Influence: Technology and Unpublished Opinions in the Federal Courts of Appeal (1997) 85 Calif. L. Rev. 541; and D. Merritt and J. Brudney, Stalking Secret Law: What Predicts Publication in the United

States Court of Appeals (2001) 54 Vand. L. Rev. 71.

unpub report

Nothing contained herein is tendered as nor should it be considered as legal advice. What is legal is not necessarily justice. Almost all of reality is non-"published", ergo, what is legally affirmed is always a retarded misrepresentation of reality. Use at your own risk!