Colorado case of property dispute with a town official writ large.
[ We have not fully researched whether the harassment statute used is strictly a "civil harassment". However, the dynamics appear similar.]
From a comment at Volock Conspiracy
Kay Sieverding says:
I thought the idea is that prior restraint isn’t allowed unless it is related to a crime, such as yelling fire when there is none, or making bomb threats but that it is supposed to be easy to get an evidentiary hearing about false statements. In the context of a divorced couple I don’t know about statements related to sex and genitals and other really private stuff. Like Ty’s account, I passed out flyers complaining about development and zoning violations and for that and making oral accusations of constitutional violations I was criminally charged and basically put on house arrest until I sold my house below value to the lawyer of the city council president.
http://www.steamboatpilot.com/news/2000/sep/06/restraining_order_issued/
http://www.steamboatpilot.com/news/2001/jan/25/woman_in_harassment/ (
Sieverding v. U.S. Department of Justice Case No 10-5149
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
David Sieverding and Kay Sieverding
Appellants
v.
United States Department of Justice
Appellee
| Case No 10-5149 |
Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Civil
…